See Sunderland.

Well this is getting embarrassing,,, the clue that counted the most was under my nose all the time,, in that first letter to Oldfield..... How does that nice tidy "sorry for obvious reasons" deteriorate into that nasty leaned over mess so quickly,, by the time you get half down the page the writing has become very scrawled..... And what on earth was going on with that S in Sunderland,, it is very odd,, where would that come from...... I reckon the author was deliberately producing a Ripper style of handwriting that was dissimilar from their normal style,, and if the first two or three lines (as the writer is struggling to change from one style to the other) are the closest match to that persons normal writing,, well,, all three letters were heavily disguised,, and quite a good job was made of it too,, especially the third letter as it looks so convincing... So now I am looking at the peculiar quirks much more closely,, and noticed the strange SSS's.. One can see that the S in Sunderland has developed from the peculiar example's I show above,, cept a large leading loop has been added to disguise the unusual capitalized form.... Out of the seven letters dated from Dec 76 to Mar 80, the best examples seem to come from her Feb 79 letter,,it is enough to show that she experimented with that unusual form,, they are so very quirky.... I reckon I've got enough here to get Humble "fixed up for a sex change",,,, Hah Hah... Not kidding,,have a look at the rest of my images...